Gold was supposed to shine during crisis. Instead, it fell hard. Here’s why the safe-haven story is breaking down in real time.
KEY TAKEAWAYS
-
Gold reached its peak before the geopolitical escalation with Iran, which challenges the widely accepted narrative that gold rises during crisis. The timing suggests the rally was already mature before the catalyst that should have supported it.
-
Gold declined sharply during the actual period of heightened geopolitical risk, including a significant weekly drop and a much larger drawdown from its highs. This contradicts the traditional safe-haven thesis.
-
Momentum, not fundamentals, played a dominant role in the rally, as evidenced by strong ETF inflows and retail participation. The World Gold Council’s own data supports the idea that speculative positioning drove prices.
-
Macroeconomic conditions shifted against gold as oil prices rose, the dollar strengthened, and Treasury yields increased. These forces raised the opportunity cost of holding a non-yielding asset.
-
Central bank buying provided structural demand but failed to prevent a rapid decline in prices. This reinforces the idea that such demand acts as support rather than a driver of returns.
MY HOT TAKES
-
Gold’s reputation as a safe haven is largely a narrative that breaks down under real-world conditions. When tested, the asset did not behave as expected.
-
The rally in gold was driven more by crowd behavior than by rational analysis of macroeconomic fundamentals. Investors followed momentum under the guise of prudence.
-
Retail investors were late to the trade, entering at peak levels driven by fear and headlines. Institutional money exited earlier, leaving others exposed.
-
Central bank demand is often overstated as a bullish factor when it primarily serves to stabilize prices. It does not create meaningful upside in a crowded trade.
-
Long-term wealth creation continues to favor productive assets like equities over static stores of value. Gold’s lack of yield and growth limits its role in compounding returns.
-
You can quote me: “The mythology of gold as the ultimate safe haven is one of Wall Street’s most durable and most dangerous fairy tales.”
Gilded Age.Have you bought gold recently? Are you one of those folks that always wants to own gold out of fear of what is going on in the world right now? I understand. It is conventional wisdom that is passed around both retail and institutional investment circles, as it has been for decades: buy gold when the 💩 is hitting the fan. Guys, it's a shiny, malleable industrial metal. It is technically limited in supply which gives it some intrinsic value–no different than any other limited-supply commodity. But what is it that makes gold different from, say, wheat, soy, lithium, or–dare I say–crude oil? The answer is really… nothing. I understand that in the days of yore it was used as a wealth exchange tool–currency. Today, the world trades on fiat currencies, not tied to gold, whose values are dictated by the economic and military health and strength of the issuers.
Worried about the true value of the US Dollar? Just flip your TV on and check out those shiny aircraft carriers on the other side of the world. Worried about the economic strength of the US? Look at the world's largest innovative companies–mostly created and living in the US. The point is this: the mythology of gold as the ultimate safe haven is one of Wall Street's most durable and most dangerous fairy tales. And right now, in real time, the data is quietly dismantling it–if you are willing to look closely.
Let me walk you through what actually happened. Gold hit its all-time high of $5,595 per ounce on January 29th of this year. Not last week. Not when the bombs started falling on Iran. January 29th, more than a month before the first US-Israeli strike. Think about that for a second. The metal that everyone tells you to buy when the world is on fire peaked before the fire started. When the war actually came, gold didn't soar. It crashed. From that January high, gold plunged approximately 27%--one of the worst drawdowns in over a decade–touching $4,100 in mid-March as oil spiked, the dollar strengthened, and Treasury yields climbed. Last week alone, gold fell 9.6%, its worst single-week performance since 2011. The world was genuinely on fire, and gold's response was to collapse. If that doesn't make you stop and ask some hard questions, I don't know what will. 🤔
Here is what actually happened beneath the surface, and this is the part nobody on financial television wants to talk about. The World Gold Council–the gold mining industry's own trade association, funded by the world's largest mining companies, whose entire job is to make you want to buy the stuff –acknowledged in its own research that momentum played a larger role in gold's 2025 rally than in any previous year on record. Read that again. 👈 The people most financially motivated to tell you gold is a fundamentals-driven safe haven just admitted in their own published data that what drove gold to $5,595 was not fear, not inflation, not geopolitical wisdom–it was momentum. Speculators, retail investors, systematic hedge funds, and ETF chasers all piling into the same trade at the same time, each one convinced they were the first ones through the door. Gold ETF trading volumes hit their strongest month on record in January, with retail activity nearly tripling month over month. The SPDR Gold Shares ETF crossed $180 billion in assets under management in February, recording its largest single-day retail inflow on the very day the bombs started dropping on Iran. That is not a safe haven trade. That is a crowded, panicked, momentum-driven pile-in–and those… um, always end the same way.
The mechanics of why it unraveled are important, because they tell you something about where gold goes from here. The very conditions that the Iran war created–surging oil prices, rising inflation expectations, a stronger dollar, and higher Treasury yields–turned out to be the exact conditions that destroy the investment case for gold. Gold pays no dividend, no coupon, no yield of any kind. It just sits there. When the cost of money is rising and the dollar is strengthening, the opportunity cost of owning something that pays you nothing becomes enormous. Institutional money figured this out first and rotated out. Retail investors–who had been flooding into GLD on every headline were the last ones holding the bag. Managed money positions on the COMEX flipped from heavily net long to neutral or short almost overnight, and the price went with it. By the time the ceasefire rumors started circulating this week, gold tried to bounce — and couldn't hold it. As of this morning it is back in the red, down over 1%. A market with genuine buyers doesn't behave that way.
Now I want to be fair, because there is a legitimate structural argument on the other side and I will not pretend it doesn't exist. Central banks have been buying gold at a rate of roughly 190 tons per quarter, and that physical demand does provide a real floor. JP Morgan projects combined investor and central bank demand of around 585 tons per quarter through the rest of 2026. That is not nothing. But here is the problem with that bull case. Central banks have been buying steadily for years, including all through 2025, and it did not prevent a 27% crash in six weeks. Structural demand is a floor. Floors don't make you money. And when a trade gets this crowded, when the retail pile-in is this obvious and this well-documented, the floor has a way of turning into a trapdoor.
So where does gold go from here? I am not going to give you a price target, because anyone who gives you a precise price target on gold right now is either guessing or selling something you don’t want. What I will tell you is this: the three forces that drove gold to $5,595– momentum, fear, and the expectation of Fed rate cuts –are kind of all working in reverse right now. Futures markets are currently pricing a 60% probability that the Fed holds rates unchanged for the entirety of 2026. Higher-for-longer rates mean a higher cost of owning a non-yielding asset every single day. Any progress on the Iran ceasefire–even the messy, uncertain kind we are seeing this week–removes another pillar of the fear trade. And when momentum breaks in a crowded market, it tends to break hard and fast, because everyone is trying to exit through the same door they came in through. The next key technical support sits around $4,300. Below that, you are looking at $4,200 and the 200-day moving average. Whether those levels hold will tell you a great deal about whether this is a correction inside a bull market–or something more significant.
I will leave you with this. Since 1971, gold has returned an average of 7.9% annually. The US stock market returned 10.7% over that same period, and those stocks paid dividends, built products, hired people and compounded your wealth along the way. Gold just sat in a vault waiting for the world to end. The world has a remarkable habit of not ending. 🤣 What it does do, every single time, is eventually reward the investors who understood the difference between fear and fundamentals–and had the clarity to act on that understanding when everyone else was busy buying something shiny. The question worth asking yourself this morning is not whether gold goes up or down from here. The question is whether you own it because you believe in it –or because someone else's fear made it feel like the right thing to do. Those are two very different reasons. And on Wall Street, only one of them tends to work out.
YESTERDAY’S MARKETS
Yesterday, Wall Street caught a ceasefire bid and ran with it. The Dow closed up by +0.54%, the S&P 500 gained 0.54%, and the Nasdaq added 0.77%--all three finishing in the green as oil pulled back on reports that the US delivered a 15-point peace proposal to Tehran via Pakistan. Before the session ended, Iran rejected it and countered with a demand for sovereign control over the Strait of Hormuz, which tells you everything you need to know about how durable yesterday's rally actually is. Bond yields inched higher and gold–GOLD slipped.
NEXT UP
-
Initial jobless claims (March 21st) came in at 210k, slightly higher than last week’s 205k claims.
-
Fed speakers today: Cook, Miran, Jefferson, and Barr.